WebCarol D. Watts and John D. Watts were married in 1975. In 1979, Carol filed a petition for dissolution of marriage. An interlocutory judgment was filed in 1982. Thereafter, carol … WebPrior to his entry into the partnership with Dr. Ashmore, John was earning the sum of $55,000 per year. At the time of his marriage to Carol, [171 Cal. App. 3d 369] John's …
Dividing the Debts in a California Divorce DivorceNet
WebWith respect to the "usage charges," the case of In re Marriage of Watts (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 366 [ 217 Cal.Rptr. 301] held that "the trial court erred in concluding that it … Web171 Cal.App.3d 366 (1985) 217 Cal. Rptr. 301 In re the Marriage of CAROL D. and JOHN D. WATTS. CAROL D. WATTS, Appellant, v. JOHN D. WATTS, Appellant. Docket … psychiatric institute irb prism
Supreme Court of the United States
Web(4) The business real property was worth $1,150,000 at the time of marriage and was worth $1,850,000 at the time of trial. The separate property interest in the real property is $1,118,720 and $613,120 is the fair market value of the community interest. Jerome is awarded the community interest. WebIn Watts, the court determined that a spouse who uses community property after the date of separation owes the other spouse a fee for such use. So, Watts charges are a fee on the use of marital property; whichever spouse retains the most significant property during their divorce will probably be hit with the most Watts charges. WebIn re Marriage of Weintraub (1985) Annotate this Case. [Civ. No. B002218. Court of Appeals of California, Second Appellate District, Division Five. April 25, 1985.] In re the Marriage … hoseasons hares hollow